The usual American and Japanese practice in making
charts is to place the control
limits at
µ ±
, where
µ is the mean of the distribution of individual measurements on items produced by the process in its present state, it describes the centre or aim of the process;
s is the standard deviation of the process;
n is the size of the regular samples that are taken over time to produce the data.
The probability that a particular
falls outside the µ ±
limits when the process is in
control is about 0.003, based on the assumption that we expect
to have a distribution that is
nearly normal. (Recall that the Central Limit Theorem suggests that
the sample mean will be closer to normal than the individual
measurements - approximate normality is good enough as the control
chart provides only a warning that further investigation may be
required.)
= 74.25° and 75.75°
|
For known µ and s,
an x-bar control chart for continuous data, constructed with subgroups
size n, has
Centre line Upper Control Limit ![]() Lower Control Limit
|
To produce an x-bar control chart using Minitab, the command is
MTB> xbarchart c E;
SUBC> mu k1;
SUBC> sigma k2.
where c is the column containing the data, E is the sample size and k1 and k2 are the values of µ and s.
| Subgroup | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 8.8 | 4.3 | 5.8 | 7.5 | 8.2 | 5.1 | 7.5 | 6.6 | 6.3 | 4.9 | 6.0 | 7.6 | 7.0 | 5.8 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 7.5 |
| 9.2 | 3.3 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 7.3 | 7.0 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 7.3 | 4.7 | 6.2 | 7.3 | 6.5 | 7.1 | 5.9 | 6.1 | 6.3 |
| 9.1 | 3.8 | 7.6 | 6.0 | 7.2 | 6.9 | 7.6 | 5.7 | 7.3 | 5.4 | 6.8 | 6.2 | 5.7 | 5.2 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 7.4 |
![]() | ||||||||||||||||
| 9.03 | 3.80 | 6.50 | 6.57 | 7.57 | 6.33 | 7.60 | 6.73 | 6.97 | 5.00 | 6.33 | 7.03 | 6.40 | 6.03 | 6.47 | 5.60 | 7.07 |
| 0.21 | 0.50 | 0.96 | 0.81 | 0.55 | 1.07 | 0.10 | 1.11 | 0.58 | 0.36 | 0.42 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 0.56 | 0.67 |
| 0.40 | 1.00 | 1.80 | 1.50 | 1.00 | 1.90 | 0.20 | 2.20 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 1.40 | 1.30 | 1.90 | 1.60 | 1.10 | 1.20 |
These data are used to estimate the process mean and standard deviation.
Just as we denote a mean by placing a bar over the top (
), the average of the averages, or
the grand sample mean, is denoted with a bar over the bar:
.
The average of all of the observations is
= 6.53; this is an estimate
of the process mean µ (if the process is in control).
We can estimate the process standard deviation from the average of the standard deviations of the subgroups:

Again, we must assume the process is in control, at least with
respect to its standard deviation, for this estimate to be meaningful.
The estimate based on
is not
an unbiased estimate of the process standard deviation. Constants
(usually referred to as c4) have been computed which
yield an unbiased estimate of the process standard deviation, s, (at least for normally distributed data) given
by
/c4.
The value of c4 for various subgroup sizes is shown
below.
n 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
c4 .780 .886 .921 .940 .952 .959 .965 .969 .973
Since we obtained
= 0.66,
the unbiased estimate of process standard deviation is
/c4, so
= 0.66/0.886 = 0.74. The
standard error of each subgroup mean is thus
. The mean of the distribution of subgroup averages is
the same as the mean of the distribution of single observations.
Appealing to the Central Limit Theorem, for a stable process we should
find about 99.7% of the subgroup averages within three standard errors
of
.
| ... Previous page | Next page ... |